ScienceDaily: Biochemistry News
cruise ship sinking vernon davis starship troopers starship troopers nfl nfl cruise ship italy
cruise ship sinking vernon davis starship troopers starship troopers nfl nfl cruise ship italy

Pinterest.com/michelleobama
Michelle Obama's Pinterest page.
By Jillian Eugenios
Ever wonder what the first family gets up to behind the scenes, or which have been Michelle Obama?s favorite moments of the last few years? Head on over to her newly minted Pinterest page to find out.
Her account, on the super-popular site where users ?pin? images to share with followers, has been up since Wednesday, and is run by the Obama 2012 campaign staff (when Michelle herself makes a pin, the page notes, it will be signed "-mo.") With nearly 15,000 followers, the first lady's page only follows a single person???President Barack Obama.??
Her page includes candid shots of her family, as well as a picture from a tug-of-war with Jimmy Fallon (she called Fallon a ?gracious loser?), and a photo of her push-up competition with Ellen Degeneres (Mrs. Obama won). There's also a shot of her family playing mini-golf with the caption, ?Victories of every size are cause for celebration,? and a photo of the president teaching his daughters to skip rocks across a river.?
The first lady?s Pinterest was launched with a special Father?s Day board, where she encourages followers to sign a card for her husband. ?
Recipes, a Pinterest mainstay, haven't been included on her page ? yet. Barack Obama's Pinterest page offers users a look into the Obama kitchen, including a recipe for the Obama family chili.?
But recipes could be on the way, especially considering Michelle Obama recently teamed up with Epicurious and the U.S. Department of Education to launch a recipe contest aimed at encouraging kids to ?pack a healthy lunch with a punch.? Winners of the contest will attend a special kid-friendly ?State Dinner? at the White House where some of the winning dishes will be served.?
Michelle's pinning team has some catching up to do on the photo-driven site. Her husband's page, launched three months ago, has grown to 11 boards and 170 pins.?
And Ann Romney's Pinterest is packed with recipes and images of patriotism, including a flag cake and ?patriotic dipped? strawberries.?
Follow TODAY on Pinterest!?
TODAY.com contributor Jillian Eugenios can vouch for the addictive qualities of Pinterest.?
More:?Mitt's meat loaf recipe and other finds on Ann Romney's Pinterest?
Video: Romney, Obama to campaign in Ohio on same day?
New book reveals how Mrs. O's garden grows?
Maybe she'll serve Mitt's meatloaf: Romney campaign offers dinner with Ann?
Joe Biden campaigns on Pinterest?
Ann Romney joins Twitter, defends herself in first dispatch
blow the unit bob weston bill obrien reggie mckenzie epiphany exorcism
The opening of a new laboratory should be cause for celebration, but there is an unpleasant subtext here. The Homestake site was supposed to house a far more ambitious new National Deep Underground Science and Engineering Laboratory, which would provide the deepest site on earth, allowing for scientific investigations into topics from dark matter to evolutionary biology. In 2010, however, the National Science Foundation?which had commissioned several R and D studies for such a laboratory and which had picked Homestake as one of two possible sites?decided to drop out of the project. Thus ended the prospect of a new national laboratory, and South Dakota, Sanford, and the DOE were forced to scramble to keep the smaller scale operation afloat. The deepest underground laboratory will remain in Sudbury, Canada?meaning that the United States has again ceded leadership in this aspect of laboratory infrastructure supporting frontier physics and astronomy.
amzn white house correspondents dinner phoenix coyotes bruce irvin charlie st cloud celtics josh hamilton
In Insert Coin, we look at an exciting new tech project that requires funding before it can hit production. If you'd like to pitch a project, please send us a tip with "Insert Coin" as the subject line.
The Aviator Travel Jib can give you the smooth camera moves to make your spectacle go from meh to marvel, while still being light enough to schlep around. At less than 3.75 pounds and 24-inches compacted, the device will tote anywhere but support up to six pounds, thanks to its sylphlike but rigid carbon fiber construction. It'll take your cinema cam or DSLR rig out to around six feet, and with its built-in fluid pan base, let you crane, track or truck to your heart's content. Pledge $400 and you'll get the jib, ballast, mounting hardware and a bubble level, while students can get the jib alone for $300. If that sounds like it could hit your mark, move fluidly past the break for the video.
Continue reading Insert Coin: The Aviator Travel Jib lets you crane on the go (video)
Insert Coin: The Aviator Travel Jib lets you crane on the go (video) originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 13 Jun 2012 15:41:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink |
Kickstarter | Email this | Commentstamera mowry slow jam the news madden cover obama slow jams the news metta world peace ron artest gladys knight
TEHRAN, Iran (AP) ? Proposals from both Iran and the group of six world powers will be on the table at the next round of talks in Moscow next week, not just the West's demand to halt Iran's highest level uranium enrichment, Iran's top nuclear negotiator said Wednesday.
Saeed Jalili said the European Union's foreign policy chief, Catherine Ashton, has agreed the negotiations will include Iranian proposals. The two days of talks are scheduled to begin Monday.
The talks take place against the background of indications from the Israelis and Americans of the possibility of a military strike against Iran. Both have said allowing Iran to acquire nuclear weapons is unacceptable. Iran insists its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes.
The six-nation bloc ? the five permanent U.N. Security Council members and Germany ? have demanded Iran halt its 20 percent enrichment program and close down its underground Fordo nuclear site south of Tehran.
The U.S. and its allies say the 20 percent enrichment is just steps away from being boosted to weapons-grade material.
The West is offering Iran civilian plane spare parts and nuclear fuel in exchange for dropping its 20 percent enrichment program.
Jalili briefed Iran's parliament about the upcoming talks, indicating that Iran does not see them has a simple negotiation over how much uranium enrichment Iran can carry out, if any.
"(Ashton) agreed that Iran's five-point proposal is on the agenda for the Moscow discussions, even non-nuclear issues," Jalili told an open session of parliament. "We will enter into the Moscow talks on this basis."
Tehran insists that world powers must recognize its right to enrich uranium and have called for Western oil and banking sanctions to be lifted in exchange for concessions, but it has declared it will not stop enriching uranium. Besides the 20 percent levels, Iran also enriches uranium at 3.5 to 5 percent.
The 27-nation European Union plans to begin an embargo of Iranian oil July 1, cutting off about 18 percent of Iran's oil exports.
The proposals were made in talks in Baghdad last month. The West has refused to accept Iran's proposals, and Tehran finds the Western package too one-sided.
Iran's Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi told a news conference in Tehran Wednesday that he was "optimistic" about the Moscow talks. Visiting Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, a key ally, called for a diplomatic settlement of the Iranian nuclear standoff.
Lavrov and Salehi accused the West of sending weapons and forces to destabilize the regime of Syrian President Bashar Assad, Iran's closest Middle East ally, also backed strongly by Moscow. Lavrov said Russia will hold a conference on Syria soon with the participation of 15 countries, including Iran.
Associated Pressmike d antoni resigns holes ncaa brackets 2012 odd lamar d antoni fashion star

Mesothelioma Lawsuits
Mesothelioma Lawsuits Recent Filing : Mesothelioma Lawsuits are an option for those American workers who are diagnosed with this devastating cancer. Many careers put employees in the direct path of dangerous asbestos fibers that can lead to the lung problems associated with mesothelioma cancer and asbestosis. If you were exposed to asbestos through your workplace and were later diagnosed with Mesothelioma Cancer , you have the ability to pursue a Mesothelioma Lawsuit. You may benefit from a consultation with a knowledgeable Mesothelioma Lawyer who can answer questions about the procedures involved in a Mesothelioma Lawsuit. Best Legal Source can assist you as you begin the Mesothelioma Lawsuit process. Contact us today at (800) 611-7080 or through the form on this page.
1-800-619-3469
?
Best Legal Source makes the overwhelming task of finding the right Mesothelioma Lawyer much easier for you. One call to Best Legal Source can get you connected with a Mesothelioma Lawyer who will give you a free consultation about your potential Mesothelioma Lawsuit. Please call us at (800) 611-7080 with your questions or concerns. Best Legal Source has assisted thousands of injured parties in finding qualified legal representatives like the Mesothelioma Lawyer.
A Mesothelioma Lawsuit involves employees who were exposed to the hazardous substance asbestos and were later diagnosed with Mesothelioma Cancer. For a number of workers, the inhalation of asbestos fibers can cause Mesothelioma. This serious cancer is debilitating to your lungs and the lining of your organs. Contacting a Mesothelioma Lawsuit lawyer may be necessary to receive compensation for your medical bills and for your possible loss of income. Best Legal Source helps victims understand the process of a Mesothelioma Lawsuit, and we can be reached at (800) 611-7080 or through our contact form. We are eager to help you learn more about Mesothelioma Lawsuits.
If your workplace demands included contact with components such as insulation, brake pads, or other asbestos-containing building materials, you should speak with a physician and start researching the Mesothelioma Lawsuit option. You might have heard about other Mesothelioma Lawsuits and wondered if your exposure to asbestos caused Mesothelioma. This form of cancer can remain dormant in your body for a long period of time. It can also be contracted through secondary sources such as exposure to your spouse?s work clothes. Best Legal Source knows a network of experienced Mesothelioma Lawsuit attorneys who are happy to arrange a free consultation to discuss your concerns. We will find the right fit for you and your particular Mesothelioma Lawsuit case.
1-800-619-3469
?
While many local personal injury lawyers may claim to handle Mesothelioma Lawsuits, it is worthwhile to find a Mesothelioma Lawyer who can offer you a significant wealth of experience researching and pursuing Mesothelioma Lawsuits specifically. Much is at stake with these particular case types. You may have lost a family member or your income due to this disease. Working with a Mesothelioma Lawyer ensures that you have the best possible chance of obtaining a Mesothelioma Lawsuit settlement. A Mesothelioma Lawyer has the abundance of resources necessary for the complex litigation involved in most Mesothelioma Lawsuits.
Our goal at Best Legal Source is to guide you through this process and take the burden of finding the right Mesothelioma Lawyer off of your shoulders. During this difficult time, you need an outside party who is knowledgeable about Mesothelioma Lawsuits and can look out for your best interest. Best Legal Source is a trusted company with many years of experience helping injured people.
Mesothelioma Lawsuit, Mesothelioma Lawsuits and Mesothelioma Lawyer are phrases we use generally to explain the particular case type we are referring to. Call us today to discuss your Mesothelioma Lawsuit concerns and to gain contact with a Mesothelioma Lawyer who has the necessary resources to pursue your Mesothelioma Lawsuit.
1-800-619-3469
?
Mesothelioma Cancer is generally believed to be terminal and has no known cure. Because of this, many victims seek the assistance of a Mesothelioma Lawyer to represent them against the employer that put them in the hazardous environment of asbestos-containing materials. Mesothelioma Lawsuits can be the only way to prevent the financial devastation that can be caused by medical bills, loss of work and other expenses caused by Mesothelioma Cancer.
One of the problems with Mesothelioma Cancer is that it is often misdiagnosed or remains latent for many years. You may want to simply visit with a Mesothelioma Lawyer to discover what legal challenges you may face when filing a Mesothelioma Lawsuit. Asbestos has not yet been banned in this country and many industries still contain this naturally-occurring fibrous mineral. You are still welcome to call if you have not been diagnosed with Mesothelioma Cancer, but have some concerns about your current workplace. Your consultation with a Mesothelioma Lawyer will cost you nothing. Your Mesothelioma Lawyer can answer general questions about your Mesothelioma Lawsuit or give you information about Mesothelioma Lawyers in general.
There is no out-of-pocket cost associated with filing a Mesothelioma Lawsuit. You will not pay the Mesothelioma Lawyer any fees at all if the Mesothelioma Lawsuit is unsuccessful. A Mesothelioma Lawyer is only paid through a portion of the settlement or earnings of a successful Mesothelioma Lawsuit. This amount is pre-determined and you will be aware of the percentage before any documents are signed. Best Legal Source thoroughly checks out each of the Mesothelioma Lawyers we connect you with to ensure they are qualified and trustworthy.
You can take action toward a Mesothelioma Lawsuit today by speaking with Best Legal Source about your specific situation. We will promptly assist you once we receive your call at (800) 611-7080. Please don?t hesitate as time is one of the major determining factors in whether the filing of your Mesothelioma Lawsuit will be successful.
1-800-619-3469
?
The following paragraphs include segments from an actual Mesothelioma Lawsuit that was filed on May 31st of 2012. You may be interested in the trial court documents of a real Mesothelioma Lawsuit situation, so we have made the content below available to you. Best Legal Source was not involved in this Mesothelioma Lawsuit. We obtained the following information from public records.
The notes, comments and headings within the Mesothelioma Lawsuit below were added by Best Legal Source and were not part of the original Mesothelioma Lawsuit trial court documents. They were added by someone who is not a legal professional, in the hopes of making the content easier to comprehend. No part of this website or the Mesothelioma Lawsuit below should be taken as legal opinion or advice.
Christine E. Henry filed this Mesothelioma Lawsuit as a representative of the estate of Robert L. Fraley. The complaint is against the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Saberhagen Holdings Inc, and Union Carbide Corporation. The Mesothelioma Lawsuits claima concerns complaint for wrongful death and survivorship.
Plaintiff Christine E. Henry, resides in East Wenatchee, Washington and is the surviving child of Robert L. Fraley. Plaintiff has been appointed the Personal Representative of the Estate of Robert L. Fraley.
Defendants and/or their predecessors-in-interest are corporations who, at all times relevant herein, manufactured, sold or distributed asbestos-containing products or products that were used in conjunction with asbestos.
Each party must be mentioned in the Mesothelioma Lawsuit introduction. Some of the wording may seem redundant, but it is all for an explicit purpose. The Mesothelioma Lawsuit documents must include each detail including the residence of the plaintiff and any other pertinent information to the Mesothelioma Lawsuit.
Plaintiff?s decedent Robert L. Fraley , was exposed to asbestos and asbestos-containing products which had been mined, manufactured, produced, and/or placed into the stream of commerce by the defendants and/or was exposed to asbestos through the use of products manufactured by defendants. As a direct and proximate result of this exposure, plaintiff?s decedent Robert L. Fraley developed mesothelioma and died on August 31, 2011. Plaintiff provides the following information:
A. Specific Disease: Mesothelioma
B. Date of Diagnosis: April 2010
C. Military: N/A
D. Occupation: Architect
E. Places of Exposure: Multiple construction sites
F. Dates of Exposure: 1960s to December 4, 1980. This complaint does not allege exposure to asbestos on or after December 5, 1980.
G. Current Address: Deceased
The plaintiff must provide sufficient information including the time and place of exposure to asbestos. Mesothelioma Lawsuits require documentation and proof that you were actually exposed to asbestos fibers. There must be a diagnosis of mesothelioma or asbestos in order for you to pursue a Mesothelioma Lawsuit.
Plaintiff claims liability based upon the theories of product liability (RCW 7.72 et. seq.); negligence; conspiracy; spoliation; willful or wanton misconduct; strict product liability under Section 402B of the Restatement of Torts; premises liability; breach of warranty; (RCW 62A); enterprise liability; market-share liability and/or market share alternate liability; and any other applicable theory of liability. The liability-creating conduct of defendants consisted, inter alia, of negligent and unsafe design; failure to inspect, test, warn, instruct, monitor and/or recall; failure to substitute safe products; marketing or installing unreasonably dangerous or extra-hazardous and/or defective products; marketing or installing products not reasonably safe as designed; marketing or installing products not reasonably safe for lack of adequate warning and marketing or installing products with misrepresentations of product safety.
With respect to any defendant that is a manufacturer of products or equipment aboard naval or other U.S. government vessels, plaintiff claims liability, strictly based on state tort law, arising from the defendants? failure to provide adequate warnings of their products? dangerous propensities and negligence. Plaintiff expressly disclaims and is not seeking relief for any and all claims for injury against any defendant whose conduct, whether by omission or commission, was engaged in at the behest of the United States or any agency or person acting under him or under color of such office to the extent such a claim would implicate federal court jurisdiction under the federal officer removal statute, 28 U.S.C. ?1442(a)(1), predicated on the government contractor?s defense articulated in Boyle v. United Technologies Corp., 487 U.S. 500 (1988).
Most specifically with respect to Plaintiffs? state tort law failure-to-warn claims, Plaintiff?s allege that no U.S. agency, officer, or person prohibited or forbid any defendant in this case from issuing and placing warnings on or with its products. Such a showing is mandatory for any defendant to meet the Boyle test. All such claims that legitimately implicate such a defense, in the unlikely event that they exist and are factually supported, are not asserted and are hereby expressly and preemptively disclaimed. Plaintiff?s hereby put any defendant who may nonetheless assert such a defense as a basis for federal jurisdiction over this case that Plaintiff seeks no recovery for injuries sustained as a result of conduct that meets the three-prong Boyle test and constitutes actions of a federal officer sufficient to trigger jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. ?1442(a)(1). Plaintiff specifically advises all defendants of its position that such express, clear, and unequivocal disclaiming of claims implicating the substantive Boyle defense, as well as any 5 other claims that legitimately implicate 28 U.S.C. ?1442(a)(1), render any potential future removal of this case to federal court on one of these clearly-disclaimed bases objectively unreasonable under Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp., 546 U.S. 132 (2005).
It is vital that you find out as much information as you can from a Mesothelioma Lawyer if you are considering a Mesothelioma Lawsuit. Often the time you file can determine whether the case can be successfully pursued. Please call Best Legal Source today to get into discussions with a Mesothelioma Lawyer.
As a proximate result of defendants? negligence and/or product liability, plaintiff?s decedent Robert L. Fraley sustained pain, suffering and disability prior to death in an amount not now known, but which will be proven at trial. Plaintiff?s decedent Robert L. Fraley also sustained medical expenses, economic losses, and funeral expenses in an amount to be proven at trial. Plaintiff Christine E. Henry has sustained loss of parent-child relationship as a result of Robert L. Fraley?s illness and death.
WHEREFORE, plaintiff prays for judgment against the defendants and each of them as follows:
1. For general and special damages specified above, including pain, suffering, loss of parent-child relationship, disability, and wrongful death;
2. For medical and related expenses, economic loss, and funeral expenses, all of which will be proven at the time of trial;
3. For plaintiff?s costs and disbursements herein;
4. For prejudgment interest in the amount to be proven at trial; and
5. For such other relief as the Court deems just.
DATED this 30th day of May, 2012.
End of Mesothelioma Lawsuit Excerpt
Again, Best Legal Source was not involved in the above Mesothelioma Lawsuit. We simply provided this example as a learning tool for those interested in researching and pursuing a Mesothelioma Lawsuit for themselves or a loved one.
1-800-619-3469
?
Tagged with: Mesothelioma ? Mesothelioma Cancer ? Mesothelioma Lawsuit ? Mesothelioma Lawsuits ? Mesothelioma Lawyer
Filed under: Mesothelioma Lawsuits
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!
rich rodriguez rich rodriguez the muppet movie the muppet movie mars rover mars rover apple cup
Tony Cenicola/The New York TimesWatch the sweetener packets to see what readers are saying about sweeteners. Post your own comment below and it may appear in the display.
White. Pink. Blue. Yellow.
On restaurant tables everywhere, the colors of the sweetener packets instantly identify the contents.
Sugar. Saccharin. Aspartame. Sucralose.
Reaching for one to pour into a cup of coffee or tea can sometimes feel like sweetener roulette, with the swirl of confusing, conflicting assertions about which are safe and which are not.
Alissa Kaplan Michaels, for one, never picks pink. She still associates saccharin with cancer. The Food and Drug Administration sought to ban it in the 1970s, because rats that gorged on the chemical developed bladder cancer.
But Congress imposed a moratorium to delay the ban, and the pink packets of Sweet?N Low remained on restaurant tables. The F.D.A. withdrew its ban proposal in 1991, and the warnings were taken off saccharin in 2000 after research showed that it acts differently in rats and humans, and no conclusive increase in cancers was observed in people. Ms. Michaels, a public relations consultant in New York, knows this.
But, she said, ?It?s the cancer in the rats. I can?t get that out of my head.?
Although many people have nagging worries about artificial sweeteners, they still use mountains of them ? globally, artificial sweeteners are a $1.5-billion-a-year market ? to avoid sugar and calories.
The scientific world is also a dichotomy of conclusions. For any of the sweeteners, one can as easily find a study that offers reassuring analysis of safety as one that enumerates potential alarming effects. And it is possible that there could be long-term effects in humans that will become evident only after people have been consuming these sweeteners for decades.
Thus hearsay, mythology and whim guide the choices of many people.
For Ms. Michaels, childhood impressions trump absolution from the F.D.A.
She even carries in her purse packets of her sweetener of choice ? sucralose, sold as Splenda ? for those occasions when a restaurant has run out of it and she might otherwise confront a choice between pink and blue. ?I?m a yellow girl,? she said.
Hundreds of millions of people swallow food and drinks containing artificial sweeteners, and so far, no widespread calamities of health have swept over them.
The F.D.A. places the three main artificial sweeteners available today in the same category: ?generally recognized as safe.? The manufacturers cite multitudes of health studies to back up that assertion.
?Based on conventional food safety considerations, the scientific community feels that these have been very adequately tested for any potential toxicities,? said Dr. Gary M. Williams, a professor of pathology at New York Medical College who has been involved in safety reviews of artificial sweeteners, some financed by the manufacturers. ?I drink diet soda. I don?t need the calories. My favorite is Fresca, and actually I don?t know what?s in it.?
Part of Dr. Williams?s confidence about safety is that the artificial sweeteners are much more intensely sweet than sugar, so people consume very little of them. Most of the white stuff in the packets is filler, not sweetener. Safety tests in animals looked at doses that were hundreds or thousands of times higher.
But critics ? particularly of aspartame, sold as Equal or NutraSweet ? say that health problems like headaches, neurological disorders and cancers are occurring, but that regulators are ignoring them.
The Center for Science in the Public Interest, a health advocacy group, slaps an ?avoid? label on saccharin and aspartame, but deems sucralose and neotame ? a newer, more intense sweetener that is chemically similar to aspartame ? to be safe. The center also warns against acesulfame potassium, a less common sweetener that is rarely found in tabletop packets but is combined with other sweeteners in soda and baked goods for a more sugarlike taste. Dr. Williams?s favorite soda, Fresca, for example, is sweetened with acesulfame potassium and aspartame, as are Halls sugar-free cough drops.
For those who turn to stevia, a sweetener derived from a plant, the center gives it a ?caution,? because cancer studies were conducted in only one species of lab animals. (?Just because a substance is natural does not mean that it is safe,? the center?s Web site warns.)
A Google search instantly turns up worries that many have about the various sweeteners: Does NutraSweet cause brain cancer? Is Splenda really in the same chemical family as DDT? What about the studies that suggest that artificial sweeteners, despite their dearth of calories, cause weight gain?
Dr. Walter Willett, chairman of the nutrition department at the Harvard School of Public Health, says people can make rational decisions, taking into account risks and uncertainty. ?The world is almost never black and white, and we rarely operate with absolute certainty about anything,? he said. ?What is most important is to avoid risks that are large and clear, like smoking, obesity and regular consumption of full-strength soda.?
Chemical Concerns
Saccharin, aspartame, sucralose and acesulfame potassium are all molecules that sidle up to certain proteins on the surface of the tongues, tickling neurons that then send a signal that exclaims to the brain: ?Sweet!?
The concerns arise over what happens to the artificial sweeteners after they are swallowed.
Consider aspartame. It is essentially two amino acids and a molecular snippet known as a methyl ester. Certain people ? about 1 in 25,000 in the United States ? have a genetic condition that prevents them from metabolizing one of the amino acids, phenylalanine, and those people are warned away from aspartame.
Many foods contain the same two amino acids, in higher quantities. ?It?s not like these are totally foreign, unique substances,? Dr. Willett said. ?It doesn?t absolutely prove they?re harmless, but it makes it less likely that there?s a huge surprise waiting for us.?
Others look at the same components of aspartame and see poisons. The two amino acids, while essential for the human diet, cause problems when present out of balance, they say.
The third part, the methyl ester, turns into methanol, which is a poison ? though fruit juices have higher concentrations of methanol. Woodrow C. Monte, emeritus professor of nutrition at the University of Arizona, ascribes a host of ills, including multiple sclerosis, to low-level methanol poisoning.
The scientific literature contains findings that can alarm or reassure. A huge study at a cancer research institute in Italy found that rats given aspartame had higher rates of leukemia and lymphomas. The National Cancer Institute in Maryland, however, reviewed health data from a half a million retirees and found no correlation between beverages with aspartame and these cancers.
Meanwhile, sucralose, as the Splenda manufacturer, McNeil Nutritionals, notes in its advertising, starts out as sugar. Chemical reactions excise bits of the sugar molecules and replace them with chlorine atoms. The chlorine effectively camouflages the molecules, and most pass through the body undigested. Hence, zero calories. But some wonder if the chlorine in the sucralose molecules that are absorbed by the body might cause a problem. Michael F. Jacobson, the executive director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, said the animal testing of sucralose was sufficient for a ?safe? rating.
The durability of sucralose molecules gives rise to a different concern. Measurable levels of sucralose have been found in the water supply, raising questions about what happens to various animals when they consume it.
Weighing the Risks
With the questions about artificial sweeteners, some may even wonder: How bad is sugar, anyway?
White sugar offers the purest taste of sweetness. It is natural. But its deleterious health effects are the best established: It can make you fatter.
Research published last year that analyzed health data on more than 100,000 nurses in the United States over nearly a quarter-century found a strong correlation between weight gain and consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and desserts. There was no weight gain for those who drank beverages with artificial sweeteners.
Obesity leads to numerous health problems ? diabetes, heart disease, even cancer. Sugary drinks like soda (fruit juices, too) particularly contribute to weight gain. Usually, if the diet changes, hunger signals adjust to ensure proper nutrition. But the human digestive system seems to overlook liquid calories. Someone who drinks the 140 calories in a 12-ounce can of Coke will not subconsciously eliminate 140 calories elsewhere in the diet.
?Liquid calories seem to be different, and that?s why they?re so problematic,? Dr. Willett said. ?Many foods contribute to weight gain, but it does appear that sugar-sweetened beverages are the single, by far, most important problem.? (That reasoning led to Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg?s proposal to ban the sale of large sugary sodas in New York City while allowing mega-size diet sodas.)
Dr. Willett said the long-term safety of the artificial sweeteners remained an open question. ?It?s interesting to keep in mind, if you smoke cigarettes, the lung cancer risk doesn?t go up for 30 years,? he said. ?And that?s a really powerful carcinogen. A lot of things don?t show up for several decades.?
He also noted that trans fats, used since 1900, did not show up on the radar of doctors? concerns until the 1990s. ?It took us about 90 years to discover it was a big problem,? Dr. Willett said. ?It?s a bit sobering how long that took.?
In terms of relative risk ? the known dangers of sugar and weight gain versus the uncertainties of artificial sweeteners ? ?artificially sweetened beverages are much less bad than the full-sugar beverages,? Dr. Willett said. Still, diet sodas are less than optimal. ?I view them like a nicotine patch,? he said.
The better solution to protect health: Eat and drink less sweet stuff.
Read the related article: ?Artificial Sweeteners: The Challenges of Tricking the Taste Buds.?
This post has been revised to reflect the following correction:
Correction: June 11, 2012
An earlier version of this article incorrectly described the composition of aspartame. An aspartame molecule essentially consists of two amino acids and a molecular snippet known as a methyl ester at one end; the methyl ester does not connect the two amino acids.
mount rainier ohio state football capital one bowl winter classic 2012 georgia bulldogs football rashard mendenhall rachel zoe
Posted by admin on 2012/06/12
Posted in Travel And Leisure? | Tagged With: anyone, could, good, leisure, murder, mystery, party, recommend, sets
Question by Jo W: Could anyone recommend any good murder mystery party sets by BV leisure?
I am planning a 15th birthday murder mystery party, I have participated in one BV leisure set (Murder at the pyramids) and it was good fun. I was wondering if anyone could recommend any other good murder mystery sets they have done/played (preferably BV leisure DVD versions)
Best answer:
Answer by partay kind of gal
Well I don?t know if it?s by the director you?re looking for, but Hannibal is a reall good movie it might not be completely horror but it?s good. Silence of The Lambs is good too.
Add your own answer in the comments!
gillian anderson leah remini desean jackson kyle orton kyle orton ncaa tournament schedule black and tan
Eye workouts to further improve imaginative and prescient vision not only function but could bring on exceptional progress inside your vision. Although a lot of people can never problem the requirement to dress in contacts or glasses, there are lots of procedures will besides help your visual acuity although guide regain 20/20 vision. What are the possibilities? Above 100 years associated with homework and final results worldwide offers tossed the advantages of corrective contact lenses out of window.
Although it isn?t most eye sight difficulties might be preset by natural means, a huge most eye-sight issues including getting shorter and also significantly seen or even the two can be cured normally.
It is advisable to understand that nowadays there are additional persons requiring corrective lenses, friends or even opting for high-priced plus high risk surgery than previously. What has induced that impressive improvement in bad eyesight? Your daily way of life!
One of the most frequent leads to pertaining to very poor visual acuity is a result of all of our chosen lifestyle both equally work plus have fun with. Computers and televisions currently have experienced an important factor within the link between our own eyesight along with eyesight.
You need to understand or know that each of us call for helpful spectacles in addition to friends to get their our own lives, their utilize triggers all of our face to be idle. The effect? Some sort of decline within eye sight as time passes and stronger lenses getting recommended time and time again. Might know about get is often a more difficult lifetime with out all of our eye glasses completely glued onto us.
The eyes are similar to any part of the shape that want training as well as leisure not only to bolster but improve all-around health. Knowing that, when was one more moment people executed any eyesight exercises to raise imaginative and prescient vision? If you are including almost everyone, the answer is likely never.
Probably the most well-liked eye exercises tips to improve eyesight is Palming. Palming makes it possible for your vision to wind down which enables it to enable lessen problems such as vision stress which may bring about hassles and also migraines.
Palming involves anyone to take a little bit daily to unwind the eyes to take a seat easily as well as covering the eyes along with your hands. Comfy the hands 1st by way of chaffing these people alongside one another in addition to deal with them for 3 or more min?s. Make an attempt to be sure that not any lighting receives with in addition to visualize a thing helpful during this time period, this can be among the simple vision physical exercises to improve perspective.
Regarding read me to boost vision are already utilized around the world within schools in many nations around the world. Children are made to complete a combination of eyesight peace methods regular. These kinds of observation exercises were in the beginning made by simply Dr William H Bates with 1880 as well as improved upon overtime.
There are many men and women globally who definitely have achieved positive results sort Physician Bates investigation in proving in which eye exercises to raise eye sight were one and only thing you needed to restore your vision naturally for most vision challenges. This specific brought about Mister Bates for being shunned by means of the competitors.
Your neighborhood eye doctor can be making a really fitness prescribing a pair of glasses and phone lens, their causes are to set their back bank account and not show you eyesight exercises to improve eye sight naturally. Laser light surgical treatment is not only extremely expensive however is included with massive health conditions.
ufc on fox 2 supercross christina aguilera etta james funeral sundance film festival victoria azarenka the flintstones etta james
LONDON (Reuters) - Former Prime Minister Gordon Brown flatly contradicted media tycoon Rupert Murdoch at a judicial hearing on Monday, suggesting the News Corp chief had misled the government-sponsored inquiry into press ethics under oath.
Murdoch told the inquiry earlier this year that the then Labour prime minister telephoned him in September 2009 after The Sun newspaper switched its allegiance to the Conservative Party and threatened to unleash war on Murdoch's company in revenge.
"This conversation never took place," Brown, who served as prime minister from 2007 to 2010, told the Leveson inquiry into media ethics at the Royal Courts of Justice. "I am shocked and surprised that it should be suggested."
"Mr Murdoch is wrong to assert under oath that I rang him in late September 2009, or around then," Brown said in a written statement to the inquiry. "His claim - that when The Sun switched support I called to complain and threaten him - has no foundation in fact."
A former British leader accusing Murdoch of misleading the inquiry under oath could further tarnish the reputation of the world's most powerful media tycoon in a country which is home to some of his biggest newspaper and broadcasting interests.
When pressed on how a serving prime minister could make such a threat, Murdoch had told the inquiry: "I don't think he was in a very balanced state of mind."
"We were talking more quietly than you or I are now - he said, 'Well, your company has declared war on my government and we have no alternative but to make war on your company,'" Murdoch told the inquiry on April 25.
Following Brown's evidence, a News Corp spokeswoman said: "Rupert Murdoch stands behind his testimony."
WAR WITH MURDOCH?
Brown said Murdoch was wrong about the date and the contents of the phone call, and supplied records which showed he made just two calls to Murdoch in 2009, one in March and one in November. He said this was a complete list of calls to Murdoch.
Brown also submitted as evidence to the inquiry statements by five of his advisers that show none of the five heard Brown threaten Murdoch on the call in question, which Brown said focused on The Sun's coverage of the war in Afghanistan.
Aides, including Brown's special adviser, director of strategy and deputy chief of staff, said he made no such threat on the call, which took place on November 10. Murdoch had said the call took place on September 30.
"I listened to the phone call between Mr Brown and Mr Murdoch in November 2009," Stewart Wood, special adviser to the Prime Minister's office, said in a statement dated October 2011 that Reuters has seen.
"At no point in the conversation was threatening language of any sort used by either Mr Brown or Mr Murdoch," Wood said.
Lawyers cautioned that given the highly politicised nature of the case, it could be difficult to prove beyond all reasonable doubt who was telling the truth. Perjury carries a maximum prison sentence of seven years in England.
But the seriousness of Brown's claim could tarnish Murdoch whom a British parliamentary committee which investigated allegations of illegal phone-hacking by Murdoch publications has already deemed unfit to manage a major global company.
"It's got to the point that no one can tell quite what happened, but the fact that a former prime minister is dragging this into the public domain can't be good news for News Corp," Brian Cathcart, a founder of the Hacked Off group which led the campaign to have a judicial inquiry, told Reuters.
"Here is a former prime minister putting them back on the spot with what is a serious allegation that was made in court. It just won't go away," Cathcart said.
BROWN'S SON
During his testimony, Brown also challenged a version of events given by Murdoch's lieutenant, Rebekah Brooks, about a Sun report that Brown's son Fraser had been diagnosed with cystic fibrosis.
Brooks, who was charged last month with interfering with a police investigation into the phone hacking scandal, told the inquiry the Browns had given their backing to the story.
"I have never sought to bring my children into the public domain," Brown said. He denied his consent had been given to publish the story. "I find it sad that even now in 2012 members of the News International staff are coming to this inquiry and maintaining this fiction."
The former prime minister had questioned whether the paper hacked into his son's medical records to get the story. Brooks has denied this and Murdoch has said the story was broken when the father of another child tipped off the newspaper.
Brown said a local National Health Service branch in Scotland had apologised to his family because information about his son came from NHS staff. "There were only a few medical people who knew that our son had this condition," Brown said.
He said the NHS in the district of Fife "now believe it highly likely that there was unauthorised information given by a medical or working member of the NHS staff that allowed the Sun through this middle man to publish this story".
Murdoch has described a relationship with Brown that included meals which their wives attended and conversations on topics ranging from charity to the war in Afghanistan.
Brooks told the Leveson inquiry she formed a friendship with Sarah Brown and that they had had a "pyjama party" at the prime minister's official country residence, Chequers, with Murdoch's daughter, Elisabeth, and his wife, Wendi.
But Brown said he never crossed a line in his relationship with Murdoch that would have allowed the tycoon to further his business interests at the expense of the public interest.
"I think you can serve up dinner but you don't need to serve up BSkyB as part of the dinner," Brown said of a failed $12-billion bid by Murdoch's News Corp to buy the rest of the lucrative pay-TV group BSkyB that it did not already own.
(Additional reporting by Philip Baillie, Maria Golovnina, Tim Castle and Michael Holden; Editing by Michael Stott, Janet McBride and David Stamp)
occupy la miranda kerr adriana lima victoria secret angels fox 4 fox 4 vs fashion show 2011